diff --git a/content/posts/Ideas on a better content warning system for the Fediverse.adoc b/content/posts/Ideas on a better content warning system for the Fediverse.adoc
index 851dede..399499b 100644
--- a/content/posts/Ideas on a better content warning system for the Fediverse.adoc	
+++ b/content/posts/Ideas on a better content warning system for the Fediverse.adoc	
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ toc: true
 
 :fn-Masto-cw-original: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/239]
 :fn-AP-cw-subject: footnote:AP-cw-subject[https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/232]
-:fn-Masto-cw-improve: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761]
+:fn-Masto-cw-improve-1: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/8681]
+:fn-Masto-cw-improve-2: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761]
 
 :url-WP-tw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_trigger#Trigger_warnings
 :url-WP-activitypub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub
@@ -129,8 +130,9 @@ content warnings.
 ==== How likely is it that existing Fediverse servers change their implementation?
 
 ActivityPub seems to specify whatever Mastodon doesfootnote:AP-cw-subject[] and
-Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve}
-Pleroma seems to copy whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other
-server implementations. The best route right now appears to be to try to get a
-proper content warning feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers
-implement it. Or develop something better than ActivityPub.
+Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the
+situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve-1}{fn-Masto-cw-improve-2} Pleroma seems to copy
+whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other server implementations. The
+best route right now appears to be to try to get a proper content warning
+feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers implement it. Or develop
+something better than ActivityPub.