Update PERFORMANCE section with numbers building libX11 and all

its dependencies in pkgfs vs pkgsrc. You know, pkgsrc is 40% slower.

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : 6fe7cc35419d7d936cc4a996c481a7b5da57cf44
This commit is contained in:
Juan RP 2008-10-04 15:09:11 +02:00
parent 7029fec44d
commit b4b9a41fac
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions

15
README
View File

@ -90,17 +90,18 @@ That's all for now folks. I hope you find it useful, as I do.
pkgfs is really fast, trust me. That was one of my reasons to make my own
pkgsrc/ports alike system.
If you want benchmarks, here is one; building libX11 (all deps installed)
with pkgfs:
If you want benchmarks, here is one: building libX11 and all its dependencies
required (not included building xstow) with pkgfs:
217.00s real 103.23s user 29.96s system
251.20s real 121.36s user 53.94s system
versus pkgsrc (make install clean):
versus pkgsrc (make install clean clean-depends and digest previously
installed):
229.22s real 112.75s user 54.79s system
450.41s real 167.58s user 97.31s system
The difference in this package might not be too big as I might think... but
anyway, 12 seconds faster is not that bad.
That's more or less 40% faster! that's the price you pay for having those
wrappers in pkgsrc that aren't very useful on NetBSD :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO MAKE TEMPLATES