From web: scholar.social #56
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
need proof
spam
waiting for mod action
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
4 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: FediBlock/data#56
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "web-56"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Please provide receipts (proof), for example in the form of hyperlinks to posts.
The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server.
If the server isn't in use, and the objectionable content you reference is so old as to be deleted, and you can't find any to use as evidence now, should it really be blocked?
I do not believe instances should be blocked without supporting evidence.
One purpose of this list is to allow people to understand the reasons for the block recommendation. We won't include instances based on rumours.
The instance is in use, it wasnt deleted because it was old. The moment the LGBT community started to walk off it was deleted in one case, which was hours after the post was made.
They were smart, they made sure to keep most interactions in private channels exactly for this reason, so there wouldnt be any evidence other than eyewitnesses. We already know from rape victims when all there is is someones word, even when lots of people all expiernce the same thing, that isnt usually enough for people to beleive you. These people know what their doing.