From web: scholar.social #56

fediblock-backend · 2020-11-01T00:24:06+01:00

fediblock-backend commented

2020-11-01 00:24:06 +01:00

Abusive to the rights of LGBT under the guise of acceptance
Has put the lives and emotional well being of LGBT community members at risk
Doxxed members of LGBT community under guise of not acting Queer.

* Abusive to the rights of LGBT under the guise of acceptance * Has put the lives and emotional well being of LGBT community members at risk * Doxxed members of LGBT community under guise of not acting Queer.

⬇️ 1

tastytea commented

2020-11-01 00:28:18 +01:00

Please provide receipts (proof), for example in the form of hyperlinks to posts.

Noelle commented

2020-11-01 01:45:40 +01:00

First-time contributor

The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server.

brian commented

2020-11-01 07:37:06 +01:00

The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server.

If the server isn't in use, and the objectionable content you reference is so old as to be deleted, and you can't find any to use as evidence now, should it really be blocked?

I do not believe instances should be blocked without supporting evidence.

> The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server. If the server isn't in use, and the objectionable content you reference is so old as to be deleted, and you can't find any to use as evidence now, should it really be blocked? I do not believe instances should be blocked without supporting evidence.

tastytea commented

2020-11-01 09:35:38 +01:00

The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server.

One purpose of this list is to allow people to understand the reasons for the block recommendation. We won't include instances based on rumours.

> The posts have long been deleted after the initial fallout and loss of users from the server. One purpose of this list is to allow people to understand the reasons for the block recommendation. We won't include instances based on rumours.

Noelle commented

2020-11-01 16:26:52 +01:00

First-time contributor

The instance is in use, it wasnt deleted because it was old. The moment the LGBT community started to walk off it was deleted in one case, which was hours after the post was made.

They were smart, they made sure to keep most interactions in private channels exactly for this reason, so there wouldnt be any evidence other than eyewitnesses. We already know from rape victims when all there is is someones word, even when lots of people all expiernce the same thing, that isnt usually enough for people to beleive you. These people know what their doing.

The instance is in use, it wasnt deleted because it was old. The moment the LGBT community started to walk off it was deleted in one case, which was hours after the post was made. They were smart, they made sure to keep most interactions in private channels exactly for this reason, so there wouldnt be any evidence other than eyewitnesses. We already know from rape victims when all there is is someones word, even when lots of people all expiernce the same thing, that isnt usually enough for people to beleive you. These people know what their doing.

tastytea added the

need proof

label 2020-11-10 19:36:03 +01:00

tastytea added 1 commit 2021-01-09 16:32:02 +01:00