CW post: Add hyperlink to another Mastodon-issue about CW-improvement.
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd95463de4
commit
6b51db4201
|
@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ toc: true
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
:fn-Masto-cw-original: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/239]
|
:fn-Masto-cw-original: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/239]
|
||||||
:fn-AP-cw-subject: footnote:AP-cw-subject[https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/232]
|
:fn-AP-cw-subject: footnote:AP-cw-subject[https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/232]
|
||||||
:fn-Masto-cw-improve: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761]
|
:fn-Masto-cw-improve-1: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/8681]
|
||||||
|
:fn-Masto-cw-improve-2: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
:url-WP-tw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_trigger#Trigger_warnings
|
:url-WP-tw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_trigger#Trigger_warnings
|
||||||
:url-WP-activitypub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub
|
:url-WP-activitypub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub
|
||||||
|
@ -129,8 +130,9 @@ content warnings.
|
||||||
==== How likely is it that existing Fediverse servers change their implementation?
|
==== How likely is it that existing Fediverse servers change their implementation?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ActivityPub seems to specify whatever Mastodon doesfootnote:AP-cw-subject[] and
|
ActivityPub seems to specify whatever Mastodon doesfootnote:AP-cw-subject[] and
|
||||||
Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve}
|
Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the
|
||||||
Pleroma seems to copy whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other
|
situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve-1}{fn-Masto-cw-improve-2} Pleroma seems to copy
|
||||||
server implementations. The best route right now appears to be to try to get a
|
whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other server implementations. The
|
||||||
proper content warning feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers
|
best route right now appears to be to try to get a proper content warning
|
||||||
implement it. Or develop something better than ActivityPub.
|
feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers implement it. Or develop
|
||||||
|
something better than ActivityPub.
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user