CW post: Add hyperlink to another Mastodon-issue about CW-improvement.

This commit is contained in:
tastytea 2020-12-28 00:48:47 +01:00
parent dd95463de4
commit 6b51db4201
Signed by: tastytea
GPG Key ID: CFC39497F1B26E07

View File

@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ toc: true
:fn-Masto-cw-original: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/239] :fn-Masto-cw-original: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/239]
:fn-AP-cw-subject: footnote:AP-cw-subject[https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/232] :fn-AP-cw-subject: footnote:AP-cw-subject[https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/232]
:fn-Masto-cw-improve: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761] :fn-Masto-cw-improve-1: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/8681]
:fn-Masto-cw-improve-2: footnote:[https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/10761]
:url-WP-tw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_trigger#Trigger_warnings :url-WP-tw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_trigger#Trigger_warnings
:url-WP-activitypub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub :url-WP-activitypub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub
@ -129,8 +130,9 @@ content warnings.
==== How likely is it that existing Fediverse servers change their implementation? ==== How likely is it that existing Fediverse servers change their implementation?
ActivityPub seems to specify whatever Mastodon doesfootnote:AP-cw-subject[] and ActivityPub seems to specify whatever Mastodon doesfootnote:AP-cw-subject[] and
Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve} Mastodon does not seem interested to improve the
Pleroma seems to copy whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other situation.{fn-Masto-cw-improve-1}{fn-Masto-cw-improve-2} Pleroma seems to copy
server implementations. The best route right now appears to be to try to get a whatever Mastodon does. I don't know about the other server implementations. The
proper content warning feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers best route right now appears to be to try to get a proper content warning
implement it. Or develop something better than ActivityPub. feature into ActivityPub and then hope the servers implement it. Or develop
something better than ActivityPub.